And why will
Riggles be destroying my September? Well,
here's why.
Riggleman, on the plan for Desmond: "I'll get him some games, but as long as Guzman is healthy he'll be playing. If his foot flares up on him that will be an opportunity to get Desmond in there, but we also have Gonzalez and Orr who will be playing up the middle. I love to see young players play, but I don't ever want to take away the opportunity from the veterans who have been here all year... and disregard their efforts all year by planting them on the bench. Like I said, the at bats might be inconsistent."
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS, JIM?!?!1!1!!?!1!ELEVEN!!?"but I don't ever want to take away the opportunity from the veterans"
Opportunity for what, Jim? Yeah, these games down the stretch are real fucking critical, aren't they? What with this pennant race DC is in and all. Nope. No need to see what the kids have during real games in September, especially against the Division leading
Phillies. Na... you can tell how good they are against piece of shit spring training pitchers struggling to make squads, right?
Jesus.
You know exactly what you have with Cristian, Jim. An average fielding SS (although he does have a little bit better range than some) who boots the easy play
every now and then a whole helluva lot. He's also someone who never walks, and is a singles hitter with an occasional line drive home run.
What do you have with Ian Desmond, though, Jim? Well, Frank Robinson said he was Major League ready [defensively speaking] in 2005. Jim
Bowden dropped the names Derek and
Jeter when talking about him. (Of course, Frank Robinson loved Matt
LeCroy so much he openly wept for the guy, and Jim
Bowden was... well... Jim
Bowden. Oh, and I stole those two quotes from
Zuckerman over at the
Washington Times Chatter blog. It really should be an everyday read, by the way.)
So, since
Riggles is
a moronic idiot not going to give the kid a shot to play everyday, we might as well try and compare the two with the stats we do have. I sure as hell ain't gonna hold it against Ian if he has a shitty ass September because he only gets one or two pinch hit at bats per week. No one should.
Just so you know what you get with Desmond, besides playing super duper defense, he also had a break out 2009 with the bat. He started the year in AA Harrisburg and hit .306/.372/.494 with 6 HR and 13 SB is 42 games. He then got the call to go to AAA Syracuse, and kept on raking. He hit .354/.428/.461 in 55 games there with 8 SB and 1 HR. He's not a huge power guy, but he does average a HR every 12.75 games. And, let's face it, that's way better than
Goozie who averages one HR every 21.4 games. In fact, in a 162 game average season,
Goozie hits 8 HR, while Desmond hits 13. (Yes, yes, and yes... I do realize I'm comparing Desmond's Minor League stats against
Goozie's Major League stats. But that's my whole point. Since
Riggleman won't be playing Ian, we can't even see what the fuck he
can do against Major league pitching!)
So... me, personally? I like Ian's bat a little better than Cristian's, but we'll call it a wash since Cristian
is hitting against Major League pitchers and all. You know... such as
Manny Parra,
Tim Dillard,
Mat Latos,
Arthur Lee Rhodes,
Brian Bass, and
Geoff fucking Geary, after all. (And no, those pitchers were not pulled at random. Those are the six pitchers Cristian has hit his home runs off of this year. I shit you not. All-Stars they ain't.)
Let's then use defense as a measuring stick, since Minor
Leaguers and Major
Leaguers both play on the exact same size infield, with runners the exact same 90 feet apart.
Desmond's 2009 defensive ratings: .943
FLD %, and an eye popping 4.81 RF/9.
Goozie's 2009 ratings? A .962
FLD % (dead last in the
NL) and a very nice RF/9 of 4.52 (tops among
NL SS with a minimum 100 games played).
Desmond's career avg
FLD % is only .936, but keep in mind this includes his first few years in which he was learning to play the position at an elite level. Ian's avg RF/G, though, is a stellar 4.40 (again, while he was learning the position).
Goozie's MLB career
FLD % is .971 and his career RF/G is 4.19. Cristian's career Minor League
FLD % was only .952 while his Minor League RF/G was 4.55.
(For those of you that just want to know what a great SS RF/9 and
FLD % is, Ozzie Smith averaged a .978 (with three piss poor - for him- sub .970 seasons pulling him down at the beginning and end of his career). During his prime, he averaged a .981
FLD % with a single season high of .987 in both 1991 and 1987. His career RF/9 was 5.2 with a single season high of 5.87 in 1981 and 1982.)
Okay, okay... so it's obvious Ian has better range, while Cristian's fielding percentage is a little higher. But everyone knows fielding percentage is old and inadequate, right? You don't? Just do yourself a favor. Google "why fielding percentage is outdated". Sure... there are plenty of sites that pop up, but the most interesting revelation of all? This magical, wonderful,
incredibly awesome blurb thrown our way by the great people of Google:
(And with that, we come back full circle to Jim
Bowden. Sometimes I really do miss your
Segway riding, leather pants wearing face around here.)
So, since the numbers above could be judged differently by different folks, and with
Riggles apparently needing someone to draw him a picture in order to get a clue, allow me to present my argument another way.
There. That about sums it up. Now how about you play him, Jimmy
Riggles? Don't make him have to twist your arm. (And by him, I mean me. And by twist your arm, I mean
this.)